Petitioners challenged an earlier Karnataka High Court order directing the Tahsildar to consider their representations regarding suit schedule property. As the Tahsildar had passed an endorsement dated 23.02.2024 complying with that direction, the court held the petition infructuous and dismissed it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:18705 WP No. 7273 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JUNE, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 7273 OF 2024 (KLR-RES)
BETWEEN:
SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT - 577 203.
Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: High Court of Karnataka
SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT - 577 203.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. SUYOG HERELE E, ADVOCATE)
AND:
SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT, SHIVAMOGGA - 577 201.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. B.P. RADHA, AGA FOR R1 TO R4; SRI. SOMASHEKARA K.M, ADVOCATE FOR R5)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SETASIDE / RECALL/ REVIEW THE ORDER DTD 12TH OCTOBER 2023 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WP NO. 20123/23 (KLR-RES), PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A AND DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NOT TO INTERFERE WITH THE PEACEFUL POSSESSION AND ENJOYMENT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTIES BY THE PETITIONERS, EXCEPT FOLLOWING DUE PROCESS OF LAW.
NC: 2024:KHC:18705 WP No. 7273 of 2024
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
In this writ petition, the petitioners are assailing the order dated 12.10.2023 passed in W.P.No.20123 of 2023 (Annexure-A) inter-alia seeking direction to respondents not to interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule property.
parties.
passed in W.P.No.20123 of 2023 read as under:
NC: 2024:KHC:18705 WP No. 7273 of 2024
court, respondent No.4 had taken decision by issuing Endorsement dated 23.02.2024 and in that view of the matter, as the direction issued by this court has been complied with by respondent No.4, the relief sought for by the petitioners has become infructuous and no further orders are required to be passed on this writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/JUDGE
SB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition seeking recall/review of the order dated 12.10.2023 in WP No.20123/2023 survived after the Tahsildar complied with the direction by endorsement dated 23.02.2024.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Parameshwarappa S/o Thathappa Yane Rajappa
Sandesh A.S S/o Sathyanna
Kumar S/o Ramaswami Yane Manikya
Sarojamma W/o Venkatesh
Sathish S/o Gopal
Manjunatha S/o Chinathambimodaliar
E.S. Indiresh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
