Disposed

Sri H Krishna Reddy v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC3 Jun 2024WP/3375/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought direction to the Tahsildar to enter his name in revenue records for land based on registered release deeds and his representation dated 22.12.2023. Without expressing any opinion on merits, the Court directed respondent No.2 to consider the representation in accordance with law within three months.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent No.2 to consider the representation dated 22.12.2023 in accordance with law within three months.

Sri H Krishna Reddy Vs the State of Karnataka — Property and Title | Karnataka HC (2024)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2024:KHC:18706 WP No. 3375 of 2024

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 3^RD DAY OF JUNE, 2024

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 3375 OF 2024 (KLR-RES)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

SRI. H. KRISHNA REDDY S/O LATE HANUMAPPA REDDY AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS R/AT NO.27, SUMERU 4^TH CROSS, GOWRAMMA LAYOUT BEHIND DOCTORS LAYOUT NAGANATHPURA ELECTRONIC CITY POST BENGALURU - 560 100

¶9

…PETITIONER (BY SRI. VINOD KUMAR K, ADVOCATE)

¶10

AND:

¶11

Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: High

¶12

Court of Karnataka

¶13

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY DEPARTMETN OF REVENUE BENGALURU - 560 001

¶14

THE TAHSILDAR BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK BENGALURU DISTRICT KANDAYA BHAVANA K.G.ROAD BENGALURU - 560 001

¶15

…RESPONDENTS

¶16

(BY SMT. B.P. RADHA, AGA)

¶17

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO

¶18

¶19

NC: 2024:KHC:18706 WP No. 3375 of 2024

¶20

DIRECT THE R-2 TO ENTER THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER IN THE REVENUE RECORDS IN RESPECT OF SY NO. 40/1 TO AN EXTENT OF 04 GUNTAS OF AGRICULTURAL LAND SITUATED AT DODDANAGAMANGALA VILLAGE, BEGUR HOBLI, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK, IN PURSUANCE TO THE REGISTERED RELEASE DEED DTD 03.09.2022 AND 07.10.2023 AT ANNEXURE-C AND ANNEXURE-D RESPECTIVELY, BY CONSIDERING THE REPRESENTATION DTD 22.12.2023 AT ANNEXURE-F IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW.

¶21

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶22

ORDER

¶23

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties.

¶24

2. Learned Additional Government Advocate

¶25

accepts notice for respondents.

¶26

The grievance of the petitioner is with

¶27

regard to consideration of the representation, dated 22.12.2023 (Annexure-F) stating that, the registered Release Deed dated 03.09.2022 (Annexure-C) and dated 07.10.2023 has been executed by Sri. Gopal

¶28

3 - NC: 2024:KHC:18706 WP No. 3375 of 2024

¶29

Reddy and Smt. Kamalamma, in favour of the petitioner herein and accordingly, he sought for change of mutation entry in his name.

¶30

In that view of the matter, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, as there is registered document is effected by Sri. Gopala Reddy and Smt. Kamalamma, in favour of the petitioner herein, respondent No.2 is directed to consider the representation dated 22.12.2023 (Annexure-F), in accordance with law, within an outer limit of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Accordingly, the writ

¶31

petition is disposed of .

Sd/-

JUDGE

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 13

Sri H Krishna Reddy v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri H Krishna Reddy v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

J Palaniswamy Vs the Tahasildar

Sri. Venkataramaiah Vs Principal Secretary

Sri K Sathish Kumar Vs the State of Karnataka

Prafulla Vs Deputy Commissioner

Sri Parameshwarappa Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri. Sadananda Vs State of Karnataka