Sparkle One Mall Developers Private Limited v. the State of Karnataka
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought writ to quash a circular regarding display boards. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn upon counsel filing a withdrawal memo.
Petitioner sought writ to quash a circular regarding display boards. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn upon counsel filing a withdrawal memo.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:42440 WP No. 696 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF OCTOBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 696 OF 2024 (LB-BMP)
BETWEEN:
SPARKLE ONE MALL DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED
Digitally signed by ANAND N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT MARKET CITY RESOURCES PRIVATE LIMITED, GROUND FLOOR, RR HOSIERY BUILDING, SHREE LAXMI WOOLLEN MILLS ESTATE, MAHALAXMI, MUMBAI 400011 AND ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE AT MALL MANAGEMENT OFFICE OF THE MALL AT PROPERTY BEARING KHATA NO 239/240/275/88/1, 240/276/89/1, BYATARAYANAPURA VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, YELAHANKA TALUK, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT, BENGALURU 560092 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY MR ABHISHEK ANAND.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SUNDARA RAMAN M V.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
NC: 2024:KHC:42440 WP No. 696 of 2024
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT.SPOORTHI V., HCGP FOR R1;
SRI. PAWAN KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE CIRCULAR BEARING NO. BBMP/HO/YV/PR/139/2023-24 DATED 26.12.23 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A AS BEING ULTRA VIRES THE PROVISIONS OF THE KARNATAKA SHOPS AND COMMERCIAL ESTABLISHMENTS ACT, THE KARNATAKA MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS ACT AND THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA; DIRECT THE R2 NOT TO TAKE ANY STEPS TO SHUT DOWN OR CLOSE IN ANY MANNER WHATSOEVER ANY ESTABLISHMENT IN THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY ON THE BASIS THAT DISPLAY BOARDS CONTAINED THE NAME OF THE ESTABLISHMENT IS NOT PROMINENTLY IN KANNADA OR FOR ANY OTHER SUCH REASON WHATSEVER.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD
ORAL ORDER
The petition is listed for orders on noncompliance of office objections. However, the
learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo for withdrawal of the petition.
In the light of the memo, subject to all just exceptions, the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/(B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE
NV
SPARKLE ONE MALL DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
BURHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE
B M SHYAM PRASAD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court