Anvar.P.V. Vs. P.K.Basheer and Others2 . Relying on the said judgments, learned counsel submits that the certificate required under Section 65 B (iv) of the Act is the condition precedent with regard to the admissibility of evidence by way of electronic record as held in the case of Anvar.P.V. referred supra. The Court has observed that the clarification or the required certificate under Section 65 B (iv) of the Act is unnecessary when the original documents itself is produced. This can be done by the owner of the laptop, computer, tablet or even a mobile phone by stepping into the witness box and providing the concerned device on which the original information is first saved is owned and operated by him. In cases where the computer happens to be a part of computer system or computer network and it becomes impossible to physically bring such system or network to the Court, then the only means of providing information contained in such electronic record can be in accordance with Section 65 B (i) together with the requisite certificate under Section 65 B (iv) of the Act. By relying on the said judgments, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that when he is producing the devices, no certificate is required and the Court had passed the order
