Disposed

Mr a N Thammannegowda v. the Inspector General of Registration

Karnataka HC3 Jun 2024WP/6604/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition filed by two petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution. They prayed for mandatory directions to register a partition deed. The court directed the registry to consider pending representations and issue necessary orders within one month.

What did the court decide?

Direct second respondent to consider representations dated 11.12.2023 and 02.01.2024 and pass appropriate orders within one month.

Mr a N Thammannegowda Vs the Inspector General of… — Property and Title | Karnataka HC (2024)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2024:KHC:18956 WP No. 6604 of 2024

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3^RD DAY OF JUNE, 2024

¶4

BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.6604 OF 2024 (GM-ST/RN)

¶6

BETWEEN:

¶7

MR A N THAMMANNEGOWDA S/O LATE NARASIMHE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, RESIDING AT ALISANDRA VILLAGE, BENDIGANAVILE HOBLI, NAGAMANGALA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT.

¶8

MR A N VASUDEV S/O LATE NARASIMHE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, RESIDING AT BELLUR CROSS, BEHIND MAYURA HOTEL, NARASIMHE GOWDA BADAVANE B G NAGAR POST, BELLUR HOBLI, NAGAMANGALA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT.

¶9

…PETITIONERS

¶10

Digitally signed by VANDANA S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶11

(BY SRI. SURENDRA KUMAR N., ADVOCATE)

¶12

AND:

¶13

THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION AND COMMISSIONER OF STAMPS 8^TH FLOOR, KANDAYA BHAVAN, KEMPEGOWDA ROAD BENGALURU-560 009.

¶14

THE SUB REGISTRAR BELLUR, NAGAMANGALA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT – 571 418.

¶15

…RESPONDENTS

¶16

(BY SRI. N.B. PATIL, AGA)

¶17

¶18

NC: 2024:KHC:18956 WP No. 6604 of 2024

¶19

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-2 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DTD. 11.12.2023, 02.01.2024, PRODUCED AT ANNX-H AND J AND THEREBY REGISTER THE PARTITION DEED FORTHWITH WITHOUT ANY FURTHER DELAY.

¶20

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FRESH MATTERS LIST, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶21

ORDER

¶22

In this petition, petitioners seeks for the following reliefs:

¶23

“(i) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction directing the second respondent to consider the representation dated 11.12.2023 and 02.01.2024 produced at Annexure H and J and thereby register the partition deed forthwith without any further delay.

¶24

(ii) And impose cost of Rs.2,00,000/- on the second respondent who has committed a serious dereliction in discharging the duties and thereby put the petitioner to untold mental agony and additional financial burden on them.

¶25

(iii) To grant such other relief or reliefs as this Hon’ble Court deems it fit to grant in the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice and equity.”

¶26

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

¶27

AGA for the respondents and perused the material on record.

¶28

It is the grievance of the petitioners that their representations dated 11.12.2023 and 02.01.2024 at Annexures – H and J submitted to the respondents has not been considered so

¶29

3 - NC: 2024:KHC:18956 WP No. 6604 of 2024

¶30

far by the respondents nor any order has been passed on the same. Under these circumstances, the petitioners are before this Court by way of the present petition.

¶31

Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents submits that if reasonable time is given, the respondents would consider and pass necessary order on the said representations.

¶32

In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances and rival submissions, the respondents are hereby directed to address the grievances of the petitioners and consider their representations dated 11.12.2023 and 02.01.2024 at Annexures – H and J and pass appropriate orders bearing in mind the material on record produced by the petitioners and in accordance with law, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶33

With the aforesaid directions, the petition stands

disposed of.

Sd/JUDGE

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 48

Mr a N Thammannegowda v. the Inspector General of Registration

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mr a N Thammannegowda v. the Inspector General of Registration

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Kasturi Vs Sri Shanthananda Vinayaka Swamy Devalaya and Sri

Yallavva Dange Vs State of Karnataka

Basavaraj Vs Ramappa

M/S Snnap Design Tech LLP. Vs Union of India

Smt Vijayalakshmi Vs the State of Karnataka

Smt Abhilasha Vs The Assistant Commissioner