The sole petitioner in a writ petition challenging a panchayat order had died. No application for substitution of legal representatives was filed. The court dismissed the writ petition as abated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:19768 WP No. 6588 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JUNE, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 6588 OF 2017 (LB-RES)
BETWEEN:
HAMEED S/O KUNHI MONU AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS R/AT ALUMBUDA HOUSE PERAJE VILLAGE,BANTWAL TALUK D K DISTRICT PIN - 574253
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. RAVISHANKAR SHASTRY G.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by HEMALATHA A Location: High Court of Karnataka
REPRESENTED BY ITS
PANCHAYAT DEVELOPMENT OFFICER
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.N CHANNA KRISHNAPPA., ADVOCATE FOR R2: NOTICE TO R1 SERVED & UNREPRESENTED)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO
QUASH THE ORDER DATED:22.10.2016 PASSED BY THE PANCHAYAT DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, PERAJE GRAMA PANCHAYAT, BANTWAL TALUK, D.K. i.e., R-1 VIDE ANNEXUREA.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
abated .
Sd/JUDGE
HA
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 52
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition abates due to the death of the sole petitioner and non-filing of legal representatives.
HAMEED
PERAJE GRAMA PANCHAYAT
RUKMAYYA GOWDA
H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
