Petition seeking a direction to authorities to consider complaints against the fifth respondent was withdrawn as not pressed; the High Court dismissed the petition on the withdrawal memo.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JUNE, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 11298 OF 2021 (LB-RES)
BETWEEN:
RANGASWAMY S/O LATE PUTTARANGANAYAKA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/O PALYA VILLAGE KOLLEGAL TALUK CHAMARAJANAGARA DISTRICT.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. K B LOKANATH.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by HEMALATHA A Location: High Court of Karnataka
CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT.
NC: 2024:KHC:19527 WP No. 11298 of 2021
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.SHIVA REDDY V., AGA.) FOR R1: NOTICE TO R2 & R4 SERVED BUT UNREPRESENTED NOTICE TO R3 & R5 UNSERVED)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R1 TO 3 TO CONSIDER THE COMPLAINT / REPRESENTATION AGAINST THE R-5 DTD 22.08.2015, 18.01.2017 AND 05.09.2019 IS PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A, B AND D RESPECTIVELY.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Sd/JUDGE
DM
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 33
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rangaswamy S/o Late Puttaranganayaka
The State of Karnataka rep by its Secretary, Rural Development and Panchayathraj Department
The Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Panchayath, Chamarajanagar District
The Executive Officer, Taluk Panchayath, Kollegal Taluk
The Secretary, Palya Grama Panchayathi
Siddappaswamy
H.T. Narendra Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
