Petitioner in a suit sought to challenge an order on a preliminary issue via Article 227, but withdrew the petition; the High Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn and closed pending applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:26951 WP No. 65373 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF JULY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
WRIT PETITION NO.65373 OF 2016 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
MRS VALSA VERGHESE CHACKO AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, W/O JOHN CHACKO IN THE PLAINT SHOWN TO BE RESIDING AT NO.50, SAMPANGI TANK ROAD, BANGALORE-25 BUT R/AT 34 ROUTE DES ESSERTS CH-1279 BOIS BOSSEY (VD) SWITZERLAND.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. JOSHUA H SAMUEL, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by MEGHA MOHAN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. M. RAJSHEKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS OF O.S.NO.5588/2004 ON THE FILE OF XLIII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE AT CCH 44 EXAMINING THE RECORDS AND SETTING ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER ON PRELIMINARY ISSUE DTD 6.11.2015 VIDE ANNEXURE-K1 AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the writ petition.
SD/JUDGE
SSB
MRS VALSA VERGHESE CHACKO
SMT MUNIYAMMA
SRI. NAGARAJ
SRI. SRINIVASA
SRI. M. RAJU
LALITHA KANNEGANTI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
