come with the present suit seeking a declaration. The plaintiffs are called as “Mulageni tenants” in respect of the plaint A schedule land and for a mandatory injunction against defendant No.2 from changing the khata of the building. Defendant No.1 is arrayed as Sri. Shivaprakash Swamy, Matadipathi (Sri. Jangam Samsthan Math, Gurupura, Dakshina Kannada, Mangalore). Then, later defendant No.1(a) who is the petitioner herein was impleaded as a defendant, it is mentioned as “Sri. Vardhamana Durgaprasad Shetty, Pramukh of Dalaha Samithi constituted by Lingaikya Sri. Shivaprakash Swamiyar, Gurupura, Dakshina Kannada, Mangalore. Now, the present application came to be filed that after the death of the original defendant, since defendant No.1(a) has been appointed as Pramukh of the Samithi to represent the day to day affairs, he had been impleaded as defendant No.1(a). Now, the Matadipathi of the Jangama Mutt has been appointed that person has to be impleaded to the suit as defendant No.1(a) has no right and authority as such the said person needs to be appointed in the place of defendant No.1(a) by deleting his name and the said application came to be allowed wherein the Court below had observed that the plaintiff is the master of his
