Writ petition under Article 227 challenging a Lokadalat order on a compromise petition in a pending suit. The petitioner repeatedly sought adjournments, did not comply with office objections and was absent when listed for dismissal. The High Court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution without deciding the merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:26520 WP No. 6395 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JULY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 6395 OF 2020 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
SRI.MANJUNATH S/O LATE YELLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/AT 10/11, KEMPANNA CROSS, 12TH CROSS, NEAR BANASHANKARI TEMPLE, DODDAMAVALI, NEAR MINERVA CIRCLE, BENGALURU-560 064
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. ARUN ASHOK GADAG, ADVOCATE- ABSENT)
AND:
Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS #116, 5TH ‘A’ CROSS HRBR LAYOUT, 3RD BLOCK KALYANANAGAR BENGALURU-560 043
2c. ANANDA S., S/O.B.M.SURESH AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS #116, 5TH ‘A’ CROSS HRBR LAYOUT, 3RD BLOCK KALYANANAGAR BENGALURU-560 043
2d. DILIP S., S/O.B.M.SURESH AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS #116, 5TH ‘A’ CROSS HRBR LAYOUT, 3RD BLOCK KALYANANAGAR BENGALURU-560 043
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. VIJAY SINGH M., ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R-4 SRI.HARSHA D.JOSHI, ADVOCATE FOR LR’S OF R2- ABSENT)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE/ QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE LOKADALAT DATED 13.07.2019 ON
COMPROMISE PETITION IN O.S.NO.7078/2018 ANNEXURE-A PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE XXIX ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU CCH-30.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ‘DISMISSAL’, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
In this Writ Petition, this Court had granted interim order on 07.12.2020. Thereafter, the same was extended and at the request of the petitioner the matter was adjourned on several occasions and the office objections were also not complied with. On 08.07.2024, as there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’.
SD/JUDGE
BN, List No.: 1 Sl No.: 14
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Manjunath S/o Late Yellappa
Parvathamma @ Parvathi D/o Late Yellappa
Y. Indrani D/o Late Yellappa (since dead by LRs)
S. Lakshminarayana
Ananda S.
Dilip S.
Lalitha Kanneganti
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
