Petitioners sought to restrain the respondent from taking possession of scheduled property pursuant to a possession notice. Having already filed an appeal before the DRT, Chennai against the DRT Bengaluru order, petitioners withdrew the writ petition, which was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:32292 WP No. 548 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL
WRIT PETITION NO. 548 OF 2022 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. KANCHAN S., ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by YAMUNA K L Location: High Court of Karnataka
AND:
THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER RELIGARE FINVEST LIMITED, 501, 5TH FLOOR, SALCON RASVILAS SAKET DISTRICT CENTRE NEW DELHI - 110 017.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SMT. JAI M PATIL.,ADVOCATE)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT RESTRAINING THE RESPONDENT FROM TAKING THE POSSESSION OF THE SCHEDULE PROEPRTY IN PURSUANCE OF POSSESSION NOTICE DTD.12.10.2021 ANNEXURE-A ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT AND ETC.,
NC: 2024:KHC:32292 WP No. 548 of 2022
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that as
against the order passed by the DRT, Bengaluru, an appeal has been filed by the petitioners before the DRT, Chennai. Hence; seeks for the withdrawal of the petition.
dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/(M.G.S. KAMAL) JUDGE
AMA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 11
Emmar Machine Tools Pvt Ltd.
Sri Madabushi Narayanan Gosakan
The Authorized Officer, Religare Finvest Limited
M.G.S. Kamal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
