A writ petition sought BBMP action to demolish an alleged illegal construction by respondent No.5. The petitioner filed a memo stating the dispute was amicably settled with respondent No.5, and the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:40887 WP No. 5153 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI
WRIT PETITION NO. 5153 OF 2024 (LB-BMP)
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by R DEEPA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
M/S. SHRI SANTHOSH MEENAKSHI TEXTILES PVT LTD., REGISTERED UNDER COMPANIES ACT 1956, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.15, SETHUPURAM, SUNDARESA IYER LAYOUT, TRICHY ROAD, COIMBATORE, TAMIL NADU-641018 REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, MR.C. UDHAYASANKAR, S/O MR. CHELLAIAH, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/AT NO.6/4, S.A. KADHAR LAYOUT, KUMAR NAGAR, ANGERIPALYAM ROAD, TIRUPUR, TAMIL NADU-641602 NOW AT BENGALURU.
…PETITIONER
(BY SMT. SEEMA P., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. DEVENDRA GOWDA R R., ADVOCATE)
AND:
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. SUMANGALA GURUDEV GACHCHINAMATH, ADV. FOR R1 TO R4;
SRI. KARTHIK V. ADVOCATE FOR R5)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TODIRECT THE R1 TO 4 TO TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION WITH REGARD TO THE COMPLAINTS DTD 29.08.2023 AND 11.10.2023 AS PER ANNEXURE-A, B AND C AND DIRECT THE R1 TO 4 TO DEMOLISH THE ILLEGAL STRUCTURE CONSTRUCTED (I.E., CONSTRUCTION PUT UP IN THE SET BACK AREAS AND THE EXTRA FLOORS) BY THE R5 OVER THE PETITION SCHEDULE B PROPERTY.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner filed a memo seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the writ petition stating that the dispute is amicably settled between the petitioner and respondent No.5, and hence the petitioner is not willing to pursue the writ petition.
withdrawn.
Sd/(ASHOK S. KINAGI) JUDGE
RD
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/S. Shri Santhosh Meenakshi Textiles Pvt Ltd
The Commissioner, Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP)
The Joint Commissioner (East), BBMP
The Assistant Director of Town Planning (East), BBMP
The Assistant Executive Engineer (AEE) (Kadugodi Ward), BBMP
Mr. K. Narasimhulu
ASHOK S. KINAGI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
