Dismissed

Smt. Anjinamma v. State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC10 Jun 2024WP/4584/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners filed a writ petition seeking quashing of their final seniority list ranking. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn, noting that the second respondent had restored their seniority and granted promotion as per the withdrawal memo.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as withdrawn upon restoration of seniority and grant of promotion by the second respondent.

Smt. Anjinamma Vs State of Karnataka — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Karnataka HC (2024)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2024:KHC:19992 WP No. 4584 of 2020

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10^TH DAY OF JUNE, 2024 BEFORE

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 4584 OF 2020 (S-PRO)

¶5

BETWEEN:

¶6

SMT. ANJINAMMA W/O H H NAGARAJ, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/AT 1^ST MAIN, 17^TH CROSS, CMD COLONY, VINOBANAGAR, DAVANAGERE-577054.

¶7

Digitally signed by NARASIMHA MURTHY VANAMALA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶8

SRI B NAGARAJA S/O BASAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, WORKING AS FDA, R/AT DOOR NO.786/18-72, CHOWDESHWARI DEVI KRUPA, BEHIND DHM CHURCH, SARASWATHI NAGAR B BLOCK, DAVANAGERE SOUTHERN EXTENSION DIVISION, DAVANAGERE-5770554.

¶9

…PETITIONERS

¶10

(BY SRI. NARAYANA REDDY M.,ADVOCATE)

¶11

AND:

¶12

STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560001.

¶13

¶14

NC: 2024:KHC:19992 WP No. 4584 of 2020

¶15

THE DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION 9^TH FLOOR, V V TOWER, DR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560001.

¶16

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER DAVANAGERE DISTRICT, DAVANAGERE-577004.

¶17

THE COMMISSIONER DAVANAGERE MAHA NAGARA PAALIKE, OPPOSITE RAILWAY STATION, DAVANAGERE-577004.

¶18

…RESPONDENTS

¶19

(BY SRI.GOPALA KRISHNA SOOD., AGA FOR R1 TO R3; SRI. B.K. MANJUNATH, ADVOCATE R4)

¶20

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO-QUASH THE FINAL SENIORITY LIST DATED 9.10.2019 AS PER ANNEXURE-A ISSUED BY R-2 / THE DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION DATED 9.10.2019 IN SO FAR AS IT CONCERNS RANKING GIVEN TO THE PETITIONERS AT SL.NOS.275 AND 279; ISSUE WRIT TO THE RESPONDENTS TO GIVE APPROPRIATE RANKING TO THE PETITIONERS IN THE FINAL SENIORITY LIST OF FIRST DIVISION ASSISTANTS AT SL.NOS.185 AND 189 CONSIDERING THE RETROSPECTIVE PROMOTIONS GIVEN TO THE PETITIONERS AS PER ANNEXURE-K DATED 28.6.2019.

¶21

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶22

¶23

NC: 2024:KHC:19992 WP No. 4584 of 2020

¶24

ORDER

¶25

Sri M.Narayana Reddy M., the learned counsel for the petitioners, has filed a memo to withdraw the petition. The office has raised objection because it is not signed by the petitioners. However, it is seen from the memo that permission to withdraw the petition is because the second respondent, in consideration of the petitioner's grievance, has restored the seniority and granted promotion. Hence, the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.

¶26

Sd/JUDGE

¶27

SA ct:sr

Smt. Anjinamma v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Anjinamma v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Karnataka State Ware Housing Corporation Vs Union of India

Smt Kasturi H M W/O Late Sri K H Mahalingappa Vs the Karnataka State Khadi Village

Sri S.Vishwanath Vs Central Bank of India

Sri M v Muniyappa Vs Chief Administrative Officer and Secretary

A.N. Narasimhaiah Vs Executive Officer

Niranjan B K Vs the Karnataka Residential