Writ petition seeking quashing of an order and settlement of retirement benefits including pension and provident fund from Central Bank of India was disposed of after the petitioner's death, his legal representatives declining to prosecute the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:19752 WP No. 2143 of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JUNE, 2024 BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2143 OF 2013 (S-R)
BETWEEN:
SRI S.VISHWANATH AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, S/O. LATE K. SHAMMANNA, R/O. NO.3268, "ANUGRAHA" 5TH CROSS, GAYATHRI NAGAR, BANGALORE- 560 021.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI.K. SREEDHAR., ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by NARASIMHA MURTHY VANAMALA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA A BODY CONSTITUTED UNDER THE BANKING COMPANIES" (ACQUISITION AND TRANSFER OF UNDERTAKINGS) ACT, 1970, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, CENTRAL OFFICE, CHANDER MUKHI, NARIMAN POINT, MUMBAI400021.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI.PRADEEP SAWKAR., ADVOCATE)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ISSUE OF WRIT OF CERTIORARI THE IMPUGNED ORDER/LETTER DATED 30.7.12 VIDE ANNX-X AS THE SAME IS ILLEGAL ARBITRARY AND UNSUSTAINABLE; DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO SETTLE ALL RETIREMENT BENEFITS SUCH AS PENSION E.L.ENCASHMENT, DIFFERENCE IN SALARY ARREARS
NC: 2024:KHC:19752 WP No. 2143 of 2013
FROM 1982 TO 1987 WHEN THE PETITIONER WAS DENIED BENEFIT OF PROMOTION TO SCALE-II, PROVIDENT FUND OWN ACCOUNT DIFFERENCE ETC PAYABLE TO THE PETITIONER TAKING INTO ACCOUNT OF THE ORDER OF COMPULSORY RETIREMENT WITH A DIRECTION TO SETTLE THE SAME WITH INTEREST AT 12% P.A. FROM THE DATE OF DUE IE., 26.9.1987 PAYMENT IS MADE.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Sri K. Sreedhar, the learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the petitioner has died and his legal representatives are not interested in prosecuting the petition.
In the light of this submission, this Court must record that the petition is abated, and the petition stands disposed of accordingly.
Sd/JUDGE
SA ct:sr
S.Vishwanath
Central Bank of India
B M Shyam Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
