The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking compensation and mandamus for recovery of amounts from respondent officers and departmental inquiries. The counsel for the petitioner sought and obtained permission to withdraw the petition, which was subsequently dismissed as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed on the grounds of withdrawal by the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF MARCH, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.NATARAJAN
WRIT PETITION NO. 432 OF 2022 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
RASHMI J M W/O GOVINDARAJULU 54 YEARS PROPRIETRIX M/S RASHMI MARKETING SY. NO. 156/2 BILLANAKOTE VILLAGE SOMPURA HOBLI, NELAMANGALA TALUK, TUMKUR ROAD, BANGALORE RURAL 562111
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI K.S. ANIL, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by GAYATHRI P G Location: High Court of Karnataka
22, ST MAIN MUTTURAYASWAMY LAYOUT NAYAPPANAHALLI BANGALORE 68
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT ANITHA GIRISH, HCGP FOR R3 TO R9)
THIS W.P. FILED PRAYING TO ISSUE MANDAMUS FOR PAYMENT OF 2500000/- COMPENSATION TO STATE/R9 FOR ALL THE MISDEEDS COMMITTED BY THEIR AUTHORITIES CONSIDERING ENTIRE ORDEALS OF THE PETITIONER AND VICTIMIZING U/S 357A OF CR PC OR UNDER PROVISIONS OF WHISTLE BLOWERS PROTECTION ACT 2011 OR ANY OTHER RELEVANT SCHEMES OR POLICIES LIKE PRIME MINISTERS RELIEF FUND VICTIM COMPENSATION (357A(2) CRPC) SCHEME ETCISSUE WRIT OF TAKE ACTION AGAINST R1 AND R2 AND OTHERS WHO INDULGING IN CORRUPTION AND PROMOTING THE SAMEISSUE WRIT TO ED TO CONDUCT ENQUIRY AGAINST R-1 AND R2 REARGING NATURE OF THEIR BUSINESS AND RELATIONSHIP AS R-2 HAS FILED NEARLY
20NI 138 CASES THIS YEAR ALONEISSUE WRIT OF MANDAMUS TOT HE CONCERNED HIGHER OFFICERS OF THE RESPONDENTS TO RECOVER THE COMPENSATION AWARDED TO THE PETITIONER FROM THE SALARY PENSION PERKS ECT OF THE RESPONDENTS INVOLVED IN THIS CASEISSUE WRIT OF MANDAMUS TO ALL THE HIGHER OFFICERS OF THE RESPECTIVE RESPONDENTS TO CONDUCT DEPARTMENTAL ENQUIRY AGAINST THEIR SUBORDINATES AND SUBMISSION OF REPORTS ABOUT THE WHOLE CASE PERTAINING TO THE INACTION AND OTHER THINGS URGED IN THIS PETITIONER BY THE PETITIONERCALL FOR LCR FROM 15TH ACMM IN CC NO.30234/2021 AND QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN THE SAME, ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for petitioner seeks permission of the
Court to withdraw the petition as not pressed.
placed on record.
Sd/JUDGE
VK
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5
Rashmi J M W/o Govindarajulu
Chandru Arjundas
Rakesh Kumar
S.H.O Byadarahalli
The Commissioner of Police
The Director General and Inspector General of Police
K. Natarajan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
