Manjula v. v Ranganath
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal came up for orders despite multiple listings for non-compliance. Counsel for appellant was persistently absent. Court dismissed appeal for default and non-compliance.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed for default and non-compliance of office objections.
What the court decided
- 1 - NC: 2024:KHC:9158 RFA No. 2089 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF MARCH, 2024 BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.NATARAJAN REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 2089 OF 2017
BETWEEN:
- MANJULA D/O LATE MAHADEVAIAH, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,
- DAKSHYANI D/O LATE MAHADEVAIAH, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS,
- SHASHIKALA D/O LATE MAHADEVAIAH, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,
- MADAMMA W/O LATE MAHADEVAIAH AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS,
Digitally signed by SHAKAMBARI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- RENUKAIAH S/O LATE MAHADEVAIAH AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,
ALL ARE RESIDING AT: HEGGADAGERE VILLAGE, BIDADI HOBLI, NANDAGUDI HOBLI, RAMANAGARA TALUK.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the first appeal should be allowed or dismissed for default.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Manjula D/o Late Mahadevaiah
- appellant
Dakshyani D/o Late Mahadevaiah
- appellant
Shashikala D/o Late Mahadevaiah
- appellant
Madamma W/o Late Mahadevaiah
- appellant
Renukaiah S/o Late Mahadevaiah
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- RFA/2089/2017
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court