Landowners challenged acquisition of their lands for BDA's Arkavathy Layout. As identical matters were referred to a committee headed by Justice K.N.Keshavanarayana under W.P.No.51929/2014, this petition was disposed of on the same terms with a direction to place the case before that committee.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:1259 WP No. 40373 of 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO. 40373 OF 2014 (LA-BDA)
BETWEEN:
D/O LATE SRI MUNIHANUMAPPA REDDY
W/O HANUMANTHA REDDY AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS,
R/AT HUTCHANAHALLI DENKANIKOTE TALUK, SATHANUR POST, DHARMAPURI DISTRICT (SENIOR CITIZEN BENEFIT NOR CLAIMED)
Digitally signed by H K HEMA Location: High Court of Karnataka
D/O LATE SRI MUNIHANUMAPPA REDDY W/O MUNIVENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, R/AT KYALASANAHALLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK, KOTHANUR POST.
D/O LATE SRI MUNIHANUMAPPA REDDY AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/AT BABUSABARAPALYA, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK,
S/O LATE SRI MUNIHANUMAPPA REDDY
NC: 2024:KHC:1259 WP No. 40373 of 2014
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/AT BABUSABARAPALYA, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK.
5. AMARAVATHI
D/O LATE SRI MUNIHANUMAPPA REDDY W/O RAMAREDDY AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS R/AT MULLUR KRISHNAPURAM BOINAPALLI POST, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
6. BALANARAYANA REDDY
S/O LATE SRI MUNIHANUMAPPA REDDY,
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/AT BABUSABARAPALYA, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK.
7. SOUBHAGYALAKSHMI
D/O LATE SRI MUNIHANUMAPPA REDDY AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/AT BABUSABARAPALYA, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI V.VINOD REDDY, ADVOCATE)
AND:
NC: 2024:KHC:1259 WP No. 40373 of 2014
BY ITS SECRETARY.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI NAVEEN CHANDRASHEKAR., AGA FOR R1.,
SRI SACHIN B.S., ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND 3.,)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICELS 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 18.06.2014 IN NO.UDD.426.MNJ.2011 ISSUED BY THE RESONDENT NO.1 VIDE ANNEXURE-F IN SO FAR AS THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS COCERNED; OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE AND ETC.,
FOLLOWING:
NC: 2024:KHC:1259 WP No. 40373 of 2014
ORDER
ORDER
i. The Writ Petition is disposed of in terms of the order passed in W.P.No.51929/2014 and other
connected matters and respondent No.2-BDA is directed to place the case of the petitioners before the committee for consideration and pass appropriate orders thereafter. ii. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of.
Sd/JUDGE
CH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 34
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the final notification acquiring the schedule property for Arkavathy Layout should be quashed insofar as it affects the petitioners' land.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt Anasuyamma & 6 others (legal heirs of Late Sri Munihanumappa Reddy)
The State of Karnataka, Urban Development Department, by its Secretary
The Bangalore Development Authority, represented by its Commissioner
The Additional Land Acquisition Officer, Bangalore Development Authority
M.I.Arun
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
