Petitioner withdrew Writ Petition No. 11862 of 2018 filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending interlocutory applications are disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO.11862 OF 2018 (LA-BDA)
BETWEEN:
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI VIKHAR AHMED B., ADVOCATE)
AND:
NC: 2024:KHC:969 WP No. 11862 of 2018
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI SACHIN B.S., ADVOCATE FOR R.1 & R.2; SRI SHREEDHAR B.E., ADVOCATE FOR C/R.3; R-4: SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)
THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NO.2 TO REFER THE DISPUTE IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY TO THE CIVIL COURT UNDER SECTIONS 30 AND 31 OF THE LAND ACQUISITION ACT, 1894 AND TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 29.06.2017 PASSED BY RESPONDENT NO.2 VIDE ANNEXURE-M AND ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
with a prayer to permit him to withdraw the writ petition
NC: 2024:KHC:969 WP No. 11862 of 2018
and also make representation to the Bangalore Development Authority to pay him the necessary
compensation in terms of the agreement that he has entered into with respondent No.3.
Sd/JUDGE
VMB
2 provisions across 2 enactments
J. Munnagappa
The Commissioner, Bangalore Development Authority
The Land Acquisition Officer, Bangalore Development Authority
The BEML Employees Co-Operative Society
Smt. Munithayamma
M. I. Arun
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
