Disposed

Premakumari K L v. the Assistant Executive Engineer

Karnataka HC5 Dec 2024WP/32674/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought directions for preparation of compensation proposals for land taken into possession without acquisition notification. The court directed respondents 1, 2 and 5 to consider the representations at Annexures B to B4 within four months and disposed of the writ petition.

What did the court decide?

Respondents 1, 2 and 5 directed to consider petitioners' representations (Annexures B to B4) within four months; writ petition disposed of.

Premakumari K L Vs the Assistant Executive Engineer — Land Acquisition | Karnataka HC (2024)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2024:KHC:50272 WP No.32674 of 2024

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 05^TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2024

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.32674 OF 2024 (LA-RES)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

PREMAKUMARI K.L. W/O LATE B.V. GOVINDARAJU AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, R/O NO.200, 9^TH CROSS, 2^ND STAGE, 'M' BLOCK, KUVEMPU NAGARA, MYSURU CITY, KASABA HOBLI, K.R. PETE TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT - 570 023.

¶9

Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶10

CHETHAN BOOKANAKERE GOVINDARAJU S/O LATE B.V. GOVINDARAJU, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/O NO.10, SRI. SANJEEVA NILAYA, 1^ST FLOOR, 15^TH CROSS ROAD, NEAR BRIGHTWEY SCHOOL, GOWDANAPALYA, SUBRAMANYA PURA, BENGALURU SOUTH, BENGALURU - 560 061.

¶11

(BY SRI. DHANANJAYA V.S., ADVOCATE)

¶12

…PETITIONERS

¶13

AND:

¶14

THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER KAVERI NEERAVARI NIGAMA LTD., NO.23, H.L.B.C. SUB-DIVISION, BUKANAKERE, K.R. PETE TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 812.

¶15

THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER H.L.B.C. NO.03 DIVISION,

¶16

2 - NC: 2024:KHC:50272 WP No.32674 of 2024

¶17

KAVERI NEERAVARI NIGAMA LTD., KRISHNARAJAPETE TOWN AND TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 426.

¶18

THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OFFICE, 1^ST FLOOR, MANDYA, MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 401.

¶19

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER MANDYA DISTRICT, MANDYA - 571 401.

¶20

THE MANAGING DIRECTOR KAVERI NEERAVARI NIGAM LTD., ANANDARAO CIRCLE, BENGALURU - 560 009.

¶21

…RESPONDENTS

¶22

(BY SRI. K.S. BHEEMAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR R1, R2 & R5; SRI. MANJUNATH K., HCGP FOR R3 AND R4)

¶23

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO PREPARE THE PROPOSALS FOR PAYMENT OF ALL KINDS OF COMPENSATIONS TO PETITIONERS IN RESPECT OF THEIR LAND, CROPS, HORTICULTURAL TREES AND OTHER DAMAGES FROM THE DATE OF TAKING POSSESSION OF THE LAND IN WHICH WITHOUT NOTIFICATIONS THE LANDS ACQUIRED AND POSSESSION WAS TAKEN AS PER REPRESENTATIONS PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE 'B' TO 'B4'; DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO PAY ALL KINDS OF COMPENSATIONS TO PETITIONERS IN RESPECT OF THE LAND, CROPS, HORTICULTURAL TREES AND OTHER DAMAGES FROM THE DATE OF TAKING POSSESSION OF THE LAND AS PER THE

¶24

¶25

NC: 2024:KHC:50272 WP No.32674 of 2024

¶26

NEW LAND ACQUISITION ACT NO.30/2013 AS PER THE REPRESENTATIONS PRODUCED AT ANNEXURES B' TO 'B4'.

¶27

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH

¶28

ORAL ORDER

¶29

In this writ petition, petitioners are seeking direction

¶30

to the respondent-Kaveri Neeravari Nigama Ltd., to prepare and submit the proposals to the respondentDeputy Commissioner for payment of compensation to the petitioners in respect of their land, crops, horticultural trees and other damages from the date of taking possession of the land as per the representations made by the petitioners produced at Annexures 'B' to 'B4'.

¶31

Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.

¶32

Taking into account the submission made by

¶33

learned counsel appearing for the parties, as the grievance of the petitioners is with regard to consideration of representations for awarding compensation in respect of acquisition of the property of petitioners, respondents 1, 2 and 5 are hereby directed to consider the representations

¶34

¶35

NC: 2024:KHC:50272 WP No.32674 of 2024

¶36

made by the petitioners produced at Annexures 'B' to 'B4', within an outer limit of four months from the date of receipt of this order. Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of.

¶37

SD/(E.S. INDIRESH) JUDGE

¶38

ARK

Premakumari K L v. the Assistant Executive Engineer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Premakumari K L v. the Assistant Executive Engineer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Savithramma Vs Bangalore Development Authority

V S Lakshminarayana Vs the Additional Chief Secretary

R Shashidhar Vs the Commissioner

Sri Ramalingu P Vs Mysore Urban Development Authority

Muthamma Vs the State of Karnataka

Smt G Lakshmi Vs State of Karnataka