Writ petition seeking direction to consider the petitioner's representation to BDA authorities. BDA noted the representation was by a welfare committee, not the petitioner. Court permitted a fresh personal representation within one week and directed BDA to decide it within four months per Division Bench observations.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:50092 WP No. 32499 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.32499 OF 2024 (LA-BDA)
BETWEEN:
SRI. C. GOVINDARAJU S/O. CHELUVAIAH AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT. KODIGEHALLI VILLAGE AND POST 2ND CROSS, MAGADI MAIN ROAD, MADALAGHATTAMMA LAYOUT, BENGALURU - 560 091.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. VASANTH KUMAR H.T., ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: High Court of Karnataka
NC: 2024:KHC:50092 WP No. 32499 of 2024
KUMARA PARK EAST, BENGALURU - 560 020.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. RASHMI M. RAO, HCGP FOR R1;
SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND 3)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONER DATED 11.11.2024 VIDE ANNEXURES-R AND S; AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
ORAL ORDER
Smt. Rashmi M. Rao, learned High Court Government Pleader accepts notice for the respondent-State and Sri. K.Krishna, learned counsel accepts notice for respondents 2 and 3.
representation dated 11.11.2024 (Annexures-R and S)
by the respondent-authorities.
for the respondent- Bangalore Development Authority (for short, BDA) submitted that representation dated 11.11.2024 is made by Kodigehalli Revenue Site Holders Welfare Committee (registered) and not by the petitioner. In that view of the matter, it is open for the petitioner to make one more representation to the respondent-BDA along with Annexure-R and S dated 11.11.2024 to enable the respondent-BDA to take decision in the matter in accordance with law. If such a representation is made by the petitioner within one week from the from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order, the same shall be considered by the respondent-BDA within an outer limit of four months, thereafter, in the light of the observation made by the Division Bench of this Court vide order
NC: 2024:KHC:50092 WP No. 32499 of 2024
dated 22.02.2024 passed in WA No.1783 of 2024 and
connected appeals. Accordingly, the writ petition is
disposed of .
SD/(E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE
SB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 28
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent-BDA was required to consider the petitioner's representation dated 11.11.2024 regarding his land grievance.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sri. C. Govindaraju
The State of Karnataka Department of Urban and Development
The Commissioner, The Bengaluru Development Authority
The Land Acquisition Officer, The Bengaluru Development Authority
E.S.Indiresh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
