The petitioner sought to quash a police notice and restrain police interference in a property dispute. The HC observed that the authorities had classified the dispute as purely civil. The petitioner subsequently applied to withdraw the petition, which was dismissed as withdrawn and infructuous.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JUNE, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR WRIT PETITION NO. 31080 OF 2017 (GM-POLICE)
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by B K MAHENDRAKUMAR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. M ASWATHANARAYANA REDDY., ADVOCATE)
AND:
BANGALORE-560 002.
…RESPONDENTS
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF INDIAN CONSTITUTION, PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS AND QUASH THE IMPUGNED NOTICE DTD 6.7.2017 ISSUED BY THE R-1 VIDE ANNEXURE-E DIRECT THE R-1 & 2 TO FOR BEAR FROM INTERFERING WITH THE PEACEFUL POSSESSION AND ENJOYMENT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY BY THE PETITIONER'S FIRM GRANT AND -INTERIM ORDER FORBEARING THE R-1 & 2 FROM INTERFERING WITH THE PEACEFUL POSSESSION AND ENJOYMENT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY BY THE PETITIONER'S FIRM.
THIS PETITION IS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo seeking
leave of this Court to withdraw the petition.
NC: 2024:KHC:18834 WP No. 31080 of 2017
endorsement is issued to the petitioner stating that the dispute between the parties is purely civil in nature and therefore, the relief sought for by the petitioner cannot be granted.
withdrawn as having become infructuous.
Sd/JUDGE
HB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 15
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the dispute between the parties is civil in nature and whether police interference is warranted?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s M U Motiwala (Represented by Partner Mr Riyaz Mohammed Motiwala)
The Asst Commissioner of Police Halasuru Gate Sub-Division
The Inspector of Police Ulsoor Gate Police Station
Sri C S Chandrashekar
Hemant Chandangoudar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
