The petitioner sought to quash a notice to restrain dispossession of schedule property. The court held the relief sought did not survive for consideration and dismissed the petition as infructuous.
Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
- 1 - NC: 2024:KHC:18832 WP No. 20448 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JUNE, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
WRIT PETITION NO. 20448 OF 2017 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
…PETITIONER
(BY SMT. CHAMPOO KAVYA S., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. SUNIL SHASTRY M., ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by B K MAHENDRAKUMAR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
SCHEDULE PROPERTY WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW. GRANT AN INTERIM ORDER TO STAY THE OPERATION OF THE NOTICE DTD 9.3.2017 AND ALL CONSEQUENTIAL PROCEEDINGS THERETO PENDING DISPOSAL OF THIS PETITION. DIRECT THE RESPONDENT FROM DISPOSSESSING THE PETITIONER FROM THE SECURED ASSET PRIVY TO THE LOAN IN ANY MANNER WHARSOEVER PENDING DISPOSAL OF THIS PETITION.
THIS PETITION IS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the relief
sought for by the petitioner does not survive for consideration.
infructuous.
Sd/JUDGE
HB
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 47
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sri Dinesh Muthuraj S/o Muthuraj
Dewan Housing Finance Corporation Ltd
Hemant Chandangoudar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
