Writ petition challenging a bank eviction notice under the SARFAESI-type proceedings; petitioners settled with the bank and withdrew the petition, with liberty reserved to avail remedies available in law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:6031 WP No. 3016 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 3016 OF 2024 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by PADMAVATHI B K Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
…PETITIONERS
(BY SMT. CHITHARA B.P., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. T.A. KARUMBAIAH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
NC: 2024:KHC:6031 WP No. 3016 of 2024
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. VIGNESH SHETTY, ADVOCATE)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO i) QUASH ANNEXURE-C THE EVICTION NOTICE DATED 22/01/2024 ISSUED BY THE R2 IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY AND ALL THE FURTHER PROCEEDINGS AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel representing the petitioners submits that
the party has negotiated with the Bank and has settled the issue and therefore, she would seek to withdraw the petition.
The petition is disposed as withdrawn, reserving liberty to the petitioners to avail of such remedy as is available in law.
SJK
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 26 CT:SNN
Sd/JUDGE
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Saroja Devi G.
Olasala Kumar @ Valasala Kumar
The Canara Bank, Jalahalli Branch
The Authorized Officer, Canara Bank, Jalahalli Branch
M.Nagaprasanna
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
