M.R. Ravi Kumar v. the Tahsildar
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition challenging an order passed on an interlocutory application; the petitioner filed a memo stating he did not intend to prosecute the petition, and the court dismissed it as withdrawn.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
- 1 - NC: 2024:KHC:33490 WP No. 28659 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF AUGUST, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA WRIT PETITION NO. 28659 OF 2016 (KVOA-)
BETWEEN:
- M.R. RAVI KUMAR, S/O.M.MUNIRAJU, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, NEW BINNMNGALA, OLD MADRAS ROAD, INDIRANAGARA, BAANGALORE-560038.
…PETITIONER
(BY SMT AADHYA CHALA, ADVOCATE FOR SRI M.V.VEDACHALA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by MAHALAKSHMI B M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M.R. Ravi Kumar
- respondent
The Tahsildar, Bengaluru North Taluk
- respondent
Sri Yellappa
- respondent
Sri Venkatesh
- respondent
Smt Shakuntalaswamy
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/28659/2016
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court