Writ petition filed to quash an order and declare arbitrary action illegal. Court dismissed the petition on the ground that it had become infructuous due to a submitted memo.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF AUGUST, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA WRIT PETITION NO. 10756 OF 2024 (EXCISE)
BETWEEN:
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI BINU M, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by MAHALAKSHMI B M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI K MANJUNATH, HCGP FOR R1 AND R3)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO A) QUASH THE ORDER DATED 02/04/2024, IN CASE BEARING NO. EXE/DTCR/514/2023-24, PASSED BY THE R1.B) DIRECTION DECLARING THAT THE ACTION OF THE RESPONDENTS WITHOUT PROVIDING SUFFICIENT OPPORTUNITY TO THE PETITIONER IS HIGHLY ARBITRARY ILLEGAL AND VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 14 AND 19(G) OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the writ
petition has become infructuous and files a memo to that effect.
infructuous .
Sd/(K.S. HEMALEKHA) JUDGE
NP
M/S Avant Garde Hospitality Pvt. Ltd.
The State of Karnataka
Joint Commissioner of Excise
Deputy Commissioner, Excise Department
K.S. Hemalekha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
