A writ petition concerning a service matter was listed for dismissal after the petitioner failed to appear on two consecutive hearings. With no representation personally or by video conferencing, the court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:26263 WP No. 27790 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JULY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 27790 OF 2015 (L-RES)
BETWEEN:
K.SRINIVASAIAH AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, S/O KADEGOWDA, NO.73, 4TH CROSS, CHINNAPPANA HALLI, DODDANEKKUNDI EXTENTION, MARATHAHALLI POST, BANGALORE-560 037.
…PETITIONER (BY SRI. K.S.SUBRAHMANYA., ADVOCATE[ABSENT])
AND:
Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka
MANAGEMENT OF PCS TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED, SHOP NO.9, 6TH BLOCK, 27TH CROSS ROAD, JAYANAGAR, OPP. AYYAPPA TEMPLE, BANGALORE-560 082. REPRESENTED BY ITS H.R.MANAGER. …RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. MANJUNATHA.B., ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
When the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, either personally or through video conferencing.
Sri.Manjunatha.B., learned counsel for the respondent has appeared in person.
As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 05.07.2024, on that day, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, either personally or through video conferencing. Hence, the office was directed to list the petition under the caption 'for dismissal' on 09.07.2024.
The petition is listed today. As already noted above, when the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, either personally or through video conferencing. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
TKN
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 60
1 provisions across 1 enactments
K.Srinivasaiah
Management of PCS Technologies Limited
Jyoti Mulimani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
