Partly allowed
Dy Maxa Technologies Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Karantaka
Karnataka HCWP/25146/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The High Court held that the Health Officer lacked jurisdiction to insist on the closure of the petitioner's industry without passing a final order. The writ petition was partly allowed, directing the respondent to consider the petitioner's reply before taking action.
What did the court decide?
The respondent No.4 is directed not to take any coercive action till passing of an order. The respondent No.4 is to consider the reply notice if submitted by the petitioner and pass appropriate order.