Dismissed

K M Prashanth v. Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike

Karnataka HC6 Aug 2024WP/2320/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners challenged a show cause notice issuing under the BBMP Act. They informed the Court that they had availed the One Time Settlement Scheme and paid the tax arrears. The Court held no issue survived and disposed of the petition as infructuous.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was disposed of as having become infructuous with liberty to avail other benefits. No specific order was passed other than dismissal.

K M Prashanth Vs Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2024)

¶1

1 - NC: 2024:KHC:31294 WP No. 2320 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶3

DATED THIS THE 6^TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2024

¶4

BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO.2320 OF 2024 (LB-TAX)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

K M PRASHANTH

¶9

S/O K.N. MALLIKARJUNA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/AT NO. 25, HONNURAPPA LANE CUBBON PET, BENGALURU-560002

¶10

K.M JAIKEERTHI S/O K.N MALLIKARJUNA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/AT NO.25, HONNURAPPA LANE CUBBON PET, BENGALURU-560002

¶11

Digitally signed by R DEEPA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶12

SMT. RASHMI ARAVINDA D/O K.N. MALLIKARJUNA W/O DEVANGA ANANDA ARAVINDA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT NO.39, D CROSS, IDEAL HOMES SOCIETY, PHASE-II RAJARAJESHWARI NAGAR BENGALURU-560098

¶13

K.N MALLIKARJUNA S/O LATE K.M NAGANNA, AGED ABOUT 83 YEARS R/AT 25, HONNARAPPA LANE CUBBON PET, BENGALURU-560002

¶14

…PETITIONERS

¶15

(BY SRI. VIJAYAKUMAR R., ADVOCATE)

¶16

2 - NC: 2024:KHC:31294 WP No. 2320 of 2024

¶17

AND:

¶18

BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER CORPORATION OFFICES, HEAD OFFICE HUDSON CIRCLE, BENGALURU-560002

¶19

THE ASST. REVENUE OFFICER KEMPEGOWDA SUB-DIVISION, KEMPEGOWDA NAGAR, B.B.M.P OFFICES, BENGALURU-560003

¶20

…RESPONDENTS

¶21

(BY SRI. ACHAPPA P B., ADVOCATE)

¶22

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO THE SHOW CAUSE NOTICE BEARING NO. ARO (KGN)/W-119/PR639/20-21 DTD 16.08.23 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 201617 (VIDE ANNEXURE-A) ISSUED UNDER SECTION 144 (15) C OF THE BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PLAIKE ACT, 2020 (FOR SHORT BBMP ACT, 2020) AND ETC.

¶23

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶24

CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI

¶25

ORAL ORDER

¶26

Learned counsel for the petitioners filed a memo

¶27

stating that the petitioners have availed One Time Settlement Scheme (OTS for short) and paid the arrears of

¶28

property tax in terms of said scheme and further submits

¶29

that petition may be disposed of reserving liberty to the

¶30

3 - NC: 2024:KHC:31294 WP No. 2320 of 2024

¶31

petitioners to avail such other benefit of payment of tax, penalty and interest that may be extended for the period from 2016-17 to 2023-24.

¶32

Memo is placed on record.

¶33

As the petitioners have availed OTS scheme and

¶34

paid the amount in terms of the scheme, nothing survives for consideration in this petition. Accordingly the petition is disposed of as having become infructuous with the aforesaid liberty.

¶35

Sd/(ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE

¶36

SKS

¶37

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 41

K M Prashanth v. Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K M Prashanth v. Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Arvind Fashions Limited Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri.C.N. Vasu Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri G H Sridhar Vs the Chief Commissioner

Sri. Vinayaka Housing Co-Operative Vs the Commissioner

Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri R Sharanabasaveshwar Vs the State of Karnataka