Writ petition challenging a revisional order under Section 136(2) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act was dismissed as the petitioner had an alternative efficacious remedy under Section 136(3), with liberty to file revision and delay condoned for time spent before the High Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO. 23147 OF 2024 (KLR-RES)
BETWEEN:
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. KARUNAKARA P., ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by CHAITHANYA K Location: High Court of Karnataka
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/AT NO. 103, WHEELER ROAD EXTN COOKE TOWN, BENGALURU - 560 005.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. B.P.RADHA, AGA FOR R1 TO R3; VIDE ORDER DATED 19.11.2024 NOTICE TO R4 & R5 DISPENSED WITH)
THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 18/01/2024 PASSED IN RA (YLK)/143/2023 PASSED BY THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU NORTH SUB DIVISION, BENGALURU AT ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN
ORAL ORDER
challenged the order passed by respondent No.2 under Section 136(2) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 (for short 'the Act').
Sd/(M.I.ARUN) JUDGE
PGG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 42
3 provisions across 2 enactments
M. Naveen Kumar
The State of Karnataka, rep. by its Chief Secretary, Department of Revenue
The Assistant Commissioner, Bangalore North Sub-Division
The Tahasildhar, Yelahanka Taluk
Smt. Masooda
Smt. Yaseema Iftaqaar
M.I. Arun
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
