Dismissed

Smt. Biligamma, v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC15 Nov 2024WP/14309/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought to withdraw a writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash impugned orders relating to a matter before the second respondent. The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru dismissed the petition as withdrawn, reserving liberty regarding time spent.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as withdrawn; liberty reserved to approach appropriate forum.

Smt. Biligamma, Vs the State of Karnataka — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2024)

¶1

1 - NC: 2024:KHC:46530 WP No. 14309 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15^TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024

¶3

BEFORE

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO.14309 OF 2023 (KLR-RES)

¶5

BETWEEN:

¶6

SMT. BILIGAMMA, W/O LATE DHARMEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, R/AT MAADRE VILLAGE, KODLIPETE HOBALI, SOMAVARAPETE TALUK KODAGU - 571 231.

¶7

…PETITIONER

¶8

(BY SRI. H.T. VASANTH KUMAR, ADVOCATE)

¶9

AND:

¶10

Digitally signed by CHAITHANYA K Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶11

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, AMBEDKAR VEEDI, BENGALURU - 560 001,

¶12

REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.

¶13

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, STUART HILL KODAGU, MADIKERI - 571 201.

¶14

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, STUART HILL KODAGU, MADIKERI - 571 201.

¶15

¶16

NC: 2024:KHC:46530 WP No. 14309 of 2023

¶17

THE TAHASILDAR, SOMAVARAPETE TALUK OFFICE, SOMAVARAPETE TALUK, KODAGU - 571 236.

¶18

…RESPONDENTS

¶19

(BY SMT. B.P. RADHA, AGA)

¶20

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED BY THE R2 DATED 30/08/2022 VIDE ANNEXURE-S BEARING NO RA.12/2022 CONFIRMING THE ORDER PASSED BY THE R3 IN NCR(V) 261/2014-15 DATED 01/04/2021 AND ETC.,

¶21

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING / PHYSICAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶22

CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN

¶23

ORAL ORDER

¶24

After arguing the matter for some time, the learned

¶25

counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that, in the light of an alternative efficacious remedy available, he intends to withdraw the writ petition.

¶26

His submission is placed on record. The memo dated 15.11.2024 for withdrawal is taken on record.

¶27

3 - NC: 2024:KHC:46530 WP No. 14309 of 2023

¶28

3. The Writ Petition is hereby dismissed as

¶29

withdrawn , reserving the liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum in the manner known to law. In that event, the authority concerned shall take into consideration the time spent by the petitioner in pursuing the remedy before this Court while considering the application for condonation of delay.

¶30

SD/(M.I.ARUN) JUDGE

¶31

¶32

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 36 CT: BHK

Smt. Biligamma, v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Biligamma, v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Atm Retail Vs Union of India

Karnataka Bank Limited Vs Additional /Joint/Deputy/ Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax / Income Tax Officer

M/S Albatross Builders and Developers LLP Vs Assistant Commissioner of Central Tax

Smt. Sundramma Vs the Principal Secretary

Sri.R.Rangaswamy Vs the State of Karnataka

Smt Jayamma Vs the State of Karnataka