sides in support of their respective claims, it is an undisputed fact and the material on record that the proceedings initiated at the instance of respondent Nos.3 to 6 against the petitioner herein before respondent No.2 – District Registrar were posted before him on 21.11.2023 and stood adjourned to 08.12.2023. Despite having adjourned the matter from 21.11.2023 to 08.12.2023, respondent No.2 – District Registrar clearly committed an error of law and jurisdiction in passing the impugned order dated 23.11.2023, without notifying the petitioner nor provided any opportunity, whatsoever to the petitioner or its office bearers and as such, on this short ground alone and for violation of principles of natural justice, I am of the considered opinion that the impugned order at annexure-C deserves to be set aside and the matter be remitted back to respondent No.2 for reconsideration afresh, in accordance with law. So also, the impugned order at Annexure-B dated 22.11.2023, which was also passed during the interregnum period of 21.11.2023 and 08.11.2023 is also violative of principles of natural justice and the same also deserves to be quashed.
