Petitioner challenged a provisional order and notice issued by the Mandya City Municipal Council concerning her residential property. Counsel withdrew the petition with liberty to challenge any provisional order passed by the competent authority.
Withdrawal with liberty to challenge the provisional order, if any, passed by the competent authority.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI
WRIT PETITION NO. 21785 OF 2024 (LB-RES)
BETWEEN:
KUM. SUSHMITHA S D/O SRI S C SHIVAKUMAR, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/AT 1ST CROSS, BEHIND JAYALAKSHMI THEATRE, GUTHALU COLONY, MANDYA-571403 REPRESENTED BY SPA HOLDER, SRI N.C. SHIVAKUMAR
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. HARIPRASAD M B., ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by R DEEPA
Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. H.K. KENCHEGOWDA, ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO
QUASH THE IMPUGNED PROVISIONAL ORDER VIDE ORDER NO. NA SA MUN/THAM. SHA. /VI.NI.06/2022-23 AND THE SAID NOTICE BOTH DATED 26.07.2024, VIDE ANNEXURE-E, ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO.2. AND DIRECT THE RESPONDENT AUTHORITIES TO REFRAIN FROM INTERFERING WITH THE PEACEFUL LIVING OF THE PETITIONER IN HER SELF-ACQUIRED PROPERTY AND THE RESIDENTIAL PREMISES CONSTRUCTED THEREON, IN ANY MANNER, WHATSOEVER AND THEREBY CONTEST IN THE SUIT BY AVAILING THE LEGAL RECOURSE THEREOF, IN ACCORDANCE OF LAW, IN RESPECT OF THE IMPUGNED PROVISIONAL ORDER VIDE ORDER NO. NA SA MUN /THAM. SHA../ VI.NI.06/2022-23 AND THE SAID NOTICE BOTH DATED 26.07.2024, VIDE ANNEXURE-E, ISSUED BY 2ND RESPONDENT AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI
ORAL ORDER
After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of the Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to challenge the provisional order, if any, passed by the competent authority.
NC: 2024:KHC:36529 WP No. 21785 of 2024
withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
Sd/(ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE
SKS
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kum. Sushmitha S D/o Sri S C Shivakumar
The State of Karnataka represented by its Secretary, Revenue Department, Vidhana Soudha, Bangalore
The Commissioner Mandya City Municipal Council
Ashok S.Kinagi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
