Petitioner filed writ petition seeking quashing of recovery proceedings. Court found petition rendered infructuous as petitioner availed One Time Settlement Scheme and disposed of the matter.
Petition disposed of as infructuous due to availing of One Time Settlement Scheme by the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 20042 OF 2024 (LB-TAX)
BETWEEN:
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI H V DEVARAJU, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by VANAMALA N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI KESHAV M DATAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 UNDER THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR CONNECTED RECORDS RELATING TO ANNEXUREE, DATED 23/05/2024 AND ANNEXURE-F, DATED 23/05/2024 BEARING NO.ARO(LAG)616/2023-24 FROM THE 2ND RESPONDENT AND;
(A) TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND TO QUASH (I) ANNEXURES-E, DATED 23/05/2024, (II) ANNEXURE-F, DATED 23/05/2024 NO.ARO (LAG) 616/2023-24 (III) ANNEXURE-G, DATED 12/02/2024 BEARING NO.ARO (LGR)W-73/PR616/2023-24 AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD
ORAL ORDER
Sri.H.V.Devaraju, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that this petition is rendered infructuous with the petitioner availing the benefit of One Time Settlement Scheme and hence, the petition stands disposed of accordingly.
Sd/(B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE
AP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 40
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sri N Narasimhaiah
The Commissioner, Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagra Palike
The Assistant Revenue Officer
B M Shyam Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
