Shivleela and Ors. v. the Secretary and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
2024:KHC-K:8907 WP No. 200215 of 2021 IN THE…
2024:KHC-K:8907 WP No. 200215 of 2021 IN THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
������������������� ���������������������
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO. 200215 OF 2021 (LB-RES)
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by LUCYGRACE
Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
(BY SRI. GURUBASAVA.C.NAYAK FOR
SRI. RAMACHANDRA.K, ADVOCATE)
…PETITIONERS
AND:
…RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE IMPUGNED NOTIFICATION OF DECLARATION OF CATEGORY SEATS TO THE ELECTION OF PRESIDENT AS GENERAL (GEN) OF GRAM PANCHAYAT KUKUNUR TALUKA YADRAMI AS PER ANNEXURE D DATED 17.01.2021 WHICH IS WRONG AND ILLEGAL AND VIOLATIVE OF RULES AND REGULATIONS OF GRAM PANCHAYAT KUKUNUR TALUKA YADRAMI WHICH HAS VIOLATED THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE PETITIONER, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
������������������� ���������������������
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR)
Learned counsel for the parties submit that the petition has
been rendered infructuous.
petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/(S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE
Srl. List No.: 1 Sl No.: 46
SHIVLEELA W/O BASAVARAJ BIRADAR
NINGAMMA W/O SAIBANNA PUJARI
VIJAYLAXMI W/O SAHEBGOUDA BHATNOOR
THE SECRETARY TO GOVT. OF KARNATAKA
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KALABURAGI
S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court