Petitioners, members of the Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Special Court, challenged a government order of 17.4.2017 concerning their service matters. Counsel filed a memo to withdraw the writ petition, and the court dismissed it as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 18622 OF 2018 (S-RES)
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by MARKONAHALLI RAMU PRIYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
NC: 2024:KHC:35806 WP No. 18622 of 2018
R/AT NO.1151, 13TH MAIN, 14TH CROSS, JUDICIAL LAYOUT, BENGALURU - 560 005.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI M NAGARAJAN, ADVOCATE)
AND:
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI GOPAL KRISHNA, AGA)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS PERTAINING TO THE IMPUGNED ORDER DTD17.4.2017 VIDE ANNEXURE-G ISSUED BY R-1 AND TO DECLARE THAT THE SAME IS ILLEGAL, VOID AND UNENFORCEABLE IN LAW. AS A CONSEQUENCE THERE OF ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT OR ORDER OR DIRECTION QUASHING DTD17.4.2017
NC: 2024:KHC:35806 WP No. 18622 of 2018
[SIC] VIDE ANNEXURE-G AS THE SAME IS ILLEGAL AND OPPOSED TO THE KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION ACT, 2011 AND THE RULES FRAMED UNDER AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS
DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. NATARAJ
ORAL ORDER
A memo is filed by the learned counsel for the petitioners to withdraw this writ petition.
Sd/(R. NATARAJ) JUDGE
THM
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 36
Ramappa
Balakrishna B
K R Niranjan
The Government of Karnataka
The Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Government of Karnataka
The Accountant General (A & E) in Karnataka
R. NATARAJ
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
