Petitioner sought a direction to the Karnataka Housing Board to consider his representation for exchange of an allotted site with an alternative vacant site at Kengeri. The Board undertook to consider the representation; the writ petition was disposed of directing consideration within one month.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:39464 WP No. 18209 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI
WRIT PETITION NO. 18209 OF 2022 (LB-RES)
BETWEEN:
SRI VENKATESHA T V S/O LATE SRI. VENKATE GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/AT SCIENTIST C, RCMA (A/C) CEMILAC, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE, MARATHALLI COLONY AND POST, BENGALURU-560037
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. PRIYAMVADA J., ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by R DEEPA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTATION DTD 14.02.2022 PRODUCED VIDE ANNEXURE-C AND CONSEQUENTLY ALLOT THE EXCHANGE / ALTERNATIVE SITE NO.87 (HIG II) (VACANT) SITUATED AT KENGERI, BANDEMATHA LAYOUT INSTEAD OF SITE NO.746B1 (HIG II) SITUATED AT BIDADI SUBHASH CHANDRA BOSE LAYOUT IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER, IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI
ORAL ORDER
The petitioner filed this writ petition seeking for
mandamus directing the respondent to consider the representation dated 14.02.2022 vide Annexure-C and pass an appropriate order.
also learned counsel for respondent No.2.
respondent No.2 may be directed to consider the representation in accordance with law. Hence, prays to dispose of the writ petition.
that if reasonable time is granted to respondent No.2, he will consider the representation vide Annexure-C and pass an appropriate order in accordance with law.
respondent No.2 will consider the representation, in view of the same, the writ petition is disposed of directing respondent No.2 to consider the representation vide Annexure-C in accordance with law, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
Sd/(ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE
SSB
1 issue framed by the court
Whether respondent No.2 could be directed to consider the petitioner's representation dated 14.02.2022 seeking exchange/alternative site allotment?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sri Venkatesha T V
State of Karnataka, rep. by its Secretary, Department of Housing
The Commissioner, Karnataka Housing Board
Ashok S. Kinagi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
