Petitioner challenged an order showing a respondent as land owner. Parties settled and prayed for amendment of records. Court set aside impugned order and directed registration of petitioner's name.
Impugned order set aside; Respondent No. 4 directed to show petitioner's name and remove respondent No. 5's name from RTC.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:50617 WP No. 16940 of 2009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO.16940 OF 2009 (KLR-RR/SUR)
BETWEEN:
RESIDING AT KOLATHUR VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI HOSAKOTE TALUK BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI G. MANIVANNAN & SRI.M. PRAKASH, ADVOCATES)
AND:
Digitally signed by H K HEMA Location: High Court of Karnataka
NC: 2024:KHC:50617 WP No. 16940 of 2009
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI HARISH A.S., AGA FOR R.1 TO R.4; SRI K. SHIVASHANKAR, ADVOCATE FOR C/R.5.)
THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH/SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER AT ANNEXURE-A PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 IN REV.PTN.29 OF 2008-09 DATED 15.06.2009 AND ORDER PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.4 M.R. NO.38/2004-05 AT ANNEXURE-C, ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN
ORAL ORDER
NC: 2024:KHC:50617 WP No. 16940 of 2009
for respondent Nos.1 to 4 has no objection for the same.
ORDER
i. The impugned order dated 15.06.2009 passed by the second respondent in Revision Petition No.29/2008-09 in respect of 1 acre of land in Sy.No.141 of Kolathur Village, Kasaba Hobli, Hoskote Taluk is hereby set aside.
ii. Respondent No.4 is directed to show the name of the petitioner in Column Nos.9 and 12(2) of the relevant RTC in respect of 1 acre of land in Sy.No.141 and remove the name of respondent No.5.
iii. The writ petition is disposed of .
Sd/(M.I.ARUN) JUDGE
VMB
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 22
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the impugned order directing the name of a person to be shown as owner of land should be set aside on account of a compromise between litigants.
Whether the land records should be amended to reflect the petitioner's name as owner following a settlement agreement.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
K.T. Anjanappa
The Secretary Land Revenue Department
Deputy Commissioner Bengaluru Rural District
The Assistant Commissioner Doddabalapura Sub-Division
The Thashildhar Hosakote Taluk
K.T. Ramaiah
M.I. Arun
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
