Dismissed

Mr Anand Kumar M v. State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC13 Mar 2024WP/16346/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed a writ petition challenging a Karnataka State Administrative Tribunal order but sought leave to withdraw. The High Court of Karnataka allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the petition along with pending interlocutory applications.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the writ petition granted. The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn. Pending interlocutory applications were disposed of.

Mr Anand Kumar M Vs State of Karnataka — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Karnataka HC (2024)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2024:KHC:11428-DB WP No. 16346 of 2021

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 13^TH DAY OF MARCH, 2024

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR

¶7

AND

¶8

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K

¶9

WRIT PETITION NO. 16346 OF 2021 (S-KSAT)

¶10

BETWEEN:

¶11

Digitally signed by HARIKRISHNA V Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶12

MR. ANAND KUMAR. M, S/O L. MARIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER, O/O CHIEF ENGINEER, HEMAVATHI ZONE, CNNL, GORURU, KARNATAKA - 573 120 PRESENTLY R/AT NO.10 VISHWESHWARAYYA ROAD, VIVEKANAGARA, NEAR LAND ARMY OFFICE, HASSAN - 573 201.

¶13

(BY SRI. PAWAN KUAMAR M.N ALONG WITH SRI. PIYUSH KUMAR JAIN, ADVOCATE)

¶14

…PETITIONER

¶15

AND:

¶16

STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, PUBLIC WORKS,

¶17

PORTS & INLAND WATER TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, VIKAS SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001.

¶18

STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL

¶19

2 - NC: 2024:KHC:11428-DB WP No. 16346 of 2021

¶20

SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, VIKAS SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001.

¶21

…RESPONDENTS

¶22

(BY SRI. VIKAS ROJIPURA, ADVOCATE)

¶23

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO-QUASH THE FINAL ORDER DATED 20.11.2020 IN APPLICATION NO.22312233/2020 PASSED BY THE KARNATAKA STATE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL AT BANGALORE VIDE ANNEXUREA, IN SO FAR AS THE DISMISSAL OF APPLICATION NO. 2233/2020 FILED BY THE PETITIONER IS CONCERNED AND CONSEQUENTLY TO ALLOW THE SAID APPLICATION NO.2233/2020 FILED BY THE PETITIONER.

¶24

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, K.SOMASHEKAR, J., MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶25

ORDER

¶26

Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition. Memo reads as under:

¶27

"The undersigned counsel submits that the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the subject writ petition. Wherefore, the Hon'ble Court may be please to take the present memo on record and permit the petitioner to withdraw the subject writ petition."

¶28

¶29

NC: 2024:KHC:11428-DB WP No. 16346 of 2021

¶30

In view of the memo, the petition is dismissed as

¶31

withdrawn.

¶32

Pending Interlocutory Applications, if any, do not survive for consideration and the same are disposed of.

¶33

Sd/JUDGE

¶34

Sd/JUDGE

¶35

HKV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 0

Mr Anand Kumar M v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mr Anand Kumar M v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri.B.S. Subramanya Gowda Vs Mr Abdul Khader

Sri Ramappa Vs Sri v Srinivasa Murthy

Bhavya. S. S. Vs the State of Karnataka

K Ramesh Vs the Director

H S Dattarreya Vs the Director

Dr Usha a R Vs the State of Karnataka