The High Court of Karnataka dismissed the writ petition filed under Article 227 as infructuous because the main civil suit it sought to challenge was disposed off in 2023, prior to the filing of the present petition.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:21389 WP No. 16190 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF JUNE, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 16190 OF 2019 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
SMT. N. CHETHANA, W/O. B. SADASHIVA, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/AT. 'SHAMBHAVI KRUPA NILAYA', 1ST FLOOR, NEAR PRASHANTHI BALAMANDIRA, BHAGATHSINGH NAGARA, VAPASANDRA CHIKKABALLAPURA, CHIKKABALLAPURA TALUK AND DISTRICT.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SIDDALINGASWAMY, ADVOCATE)
AND:
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. NANJUNDASWAMY, ADVOCATE)
NC: 2024:KHC:21389 WP No. 16190 of 2019
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER OF I.A.NO.2 DATED 27.03.2018 IN O.S.NO.351/2016 PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL CIVIL JDUGE AND JMFC, KANAKAPURA, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT, WHICH IS IMPUGNED HEREIN VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo stating that the main O.S.No.351/2016 is disposed on 01.04.2023. Hence, the Writ Petition has become infructuous. Memo is taken on record.
infructuous.
BN
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7
SD/JUDGE
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. N. Chethana
Smt. Sunandamma
Sri. Sowrappa
Justice Lalitha Kanneganti
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
