A writ petition against a Family Court order on an application in a maintenance case was dismissed after counsel submitted that the main M.C. had been disposed of, rendering the petition infructuous; pending interim applications were also disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF JUNE, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 1521 OF 2020 (GM-FC)
BETWEEN:
SHIVAKUMAR P., S/O. PUTTAMARAIAH, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/AT SANTHEMOGENAHALLI, AKUR POST, VIRUPAKSHA HOBLI, CHANNAPATNA TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 562 138.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. PRASANNA V.R., ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NO.1243, GROUND FLOOR, 10TH MAIN, WEST OF CHORD ROAD, 2ND STAGE, MAHALAKSHMIPURAM, NAGPURA, BENGALURU - 560 086.
…RESPONDENTS
NC: 2024:KHC:21387 WP No. 1521 of 2020
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 29.11.2019 ON AN APPLICATION IN CRL.MISC.NO.798/2019 PASSED BY THE LEARNED V ADDL. PRL. JUDGE, FAMILY COURT AT BENGALURU, VIDE ANENXUREA AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the main M.C. is disposed. Hence, the Writ Petition has become infructuous. Submission is taken on record.
SD/JUDGE
BN
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shivakumar P.
Smt. Shruthi N.
Harshitha S.
Lalitha Kanneganti
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
