Petitioners filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. The Court, upon being informed that petitioners do not intend to prosecute and relevant affidavits were filed, dismissed the petitions as withdrawn.
The writ petitions are hereby dismissed as the petitioners do not intend to prosecute them.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:43913 WP No. 16165 of 2023 C/W WP No. 9755 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO.16165 OF 2023 (KLR-RES)
C/W
WRIT PETITION NO.9755 OF 2024 (KLR-RR/SUR)
IN WP No.16165/2023:
BETWEEN:
S/O LATE KAVERAPPA @ MOTAPPA AND LATE MUNIYAMMA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS R/O. NO.12-1 K. CHANNASANDRA BANGALORE-560 043.
Digitally signed by CHAITHANYA K Location: High Court of Karnataka
AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS R/O. NO.33 K. CHANNASANDRA HORAMAVU, BANGALORE-560 043
REP. BY GPA HOLDER SRI R. HARISH S/O LATE RAJAGOPALCHAR AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS R/O. NO.15 NEAR AMARAJYOTHI COLLEGE LAKSHMIPURA LAYOUT BENGALURU NORTH.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI P. PRASAD, ADVOCATE)
AND:
NC: 2024:KHC:43913 WP No. 16165 of 2023 C/W WP No. 9755 of 2024
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. B.P. RADHA, AGA FOR R.1 TO R.4; SRI HEMANTH KUMAR D., ADVOCATE FOR R.5 TO R.10; R.12, R.15, R.17 & R.20 ARE SERVED.)
THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 16.06.2023 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 IN CASE NO.f.vÁA.¸À/¨sÀÆ.G.¤/C¦Ã®Ä:24/2023-24 VIDE ANNEXURE-E TO THE WRIT PETITION, ETC.
IN WP NO.9755/2024:
BETWEEN:
S/O LATE KAVERAPPA @ MOTAPPA AND LATE MUNIYAMMA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS R/O. NO.12-1 K. CHANNASANDRA BANGALORE-560 043.
HORMAVU, BANGALORE-560 043.
PETITIONERS ARE REP. BY THEIR GPA HOLDER SRI R. HARISH S/O LATE RAJAGOPALCHAR AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS R/O. NO.15 NEAR AMARAJYOTHI COLLEGE LAKSHMIPURA LAYOUT BENGALURU NORTH BENGALURU-560 036.
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI P. PRASAD, ADVOCATE)
AND:
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. B.P. RADHA, AGA)
THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT RESPONDENT NOS.5 TO 7 TO SET ASIDE THE PHODI IN RESPECT OF SY.NO.107/8 AS PER ANNEXURE-D TO THE WRIT PETITION, ETC.
THESE PETITIONS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN
ORAL ORDER
petitioners and he is represented by his Counsel Sri N.Krishna Murthy. His colleague Ms.Shwetha M.Patil, KAR No.3193/2023 is present before the Court.
NC: 2024:KHC:43913 WP No. 16165 of 2023 C/W WP No. 9755 of 2024
in the writ petitions have filed their individual affidavits
stating that they do not intend to prosecute the writ petitions.
though a General Power of Attorney has been executed in favour of Sri R.Harish, the same is not executed towards filing of the writ petitions and it is for a different purpose altogether. It is further submitted that the petitioners do not intend to prosecute the writ petitions. A memo dated
30.10.2024 is filed in this regard in both the writ petitions by Sri P.Prasad. The memos are taken on record.
aforementioned submissions, the writ petitions are hereby
dismissed. Pending I.As., if any, stand disposed of.
SD/(M.I.ARUN) JUDGE
hkh.
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petitions filed by the petitioners should be allowed given their indication to withdraw.
Whether General Power of Attorney holder is competent to withdraw the petitions.
Whether the petitions disposed of as the petitioners do not intend to prosecute them.
SRI ANJINAPPA
VENKATESH K.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
M.I.ARUN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
