under protest. After such deposit, he made a request before respondent Nos.3 and 4 to continue him as Chief Executive Officer. None the less, respondent Nos.3 and 4 without considering the previous resolutions, passed a resolution dated 31.05.2023 to approve appointment of a new Chief Executive Officer of respondent No.4. The petitioner then approached respondent No.2, challenging the order of suspension dated 19.05.2023 and the resolution dated 31.05.2023. The respondent No.2 admitted the petition but declined to grant any interim order which compelled the petitioner to approach this Court in W.P No.27271/2023. The writ petition was disposed off by this Court in terms of order dated 19.05.2023, directing the respondent No.2 to consider the Misc. Petition within an outer limit of three months. Following this, respondent No.2 passed a final order dated 15.04.2024 and ordered reinstatement of the petitioner. The petitioner thereafter submitted a representation dated 04.05.2024 and requested the respondent Nos.3 and 4 to reinstate him. The petitioner contends that, the representation was not considered and therefore, seeks directions to respondent Nos.3 and 4 to implement the order dated 15.04.2024.