Writ petition challenging a Lok Adalat compromise decree was dismissed as not pressed after petitioners filed a memo stating the matter had been settled out of court with the respondents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 116142 OF 2019 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
BOTH REP. BY THEIR GPA HOLDER SRI. EJAZ MOHAMMAD IBRAHIM AHAMADI, PETITIONER NO.5.
MALLIKARJUN RUDRAYYA KALMATH
Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. TEJPAL A. KAMAL, ADVOCATE FOR P2-P4, P6 & P7)
AND:
…RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND QUASH THE COMPROMISE DECREE PASSED IN PRE LITIGATION CASE NO.737/2018 DATED 28.8.2019 VIDE ANNEXUREC PASSED BY THE DISTRICT LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY, BELAGAVI, BEFORE LOK-ADALAT, BELAGAVI IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR)
Learned counsel for the petitioners files a memo
dated 26.11.2024 stating that matter is settled out of Court between the parties, therefore the petitioners do not want to pursue the matter against the respondents.
Sd/(PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE
CKK CT-MCK
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 63
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Bibizohara w/o. Mahaboobsab Ahamadi
Smt. Rehana w/o. Mohammad Ibrahim Ahamadi
Sri. Fayaz s/o. Mohammad Ibrahim Ahamadi
Sri. Ejaz s/o. Mohammad Ibrahim Ahamadi
Sri. Atharali s/o. Mohammad Ibrahim Ahamadi
Smt. Khurshid w/o. Abdul Munaf Ahamadi
Pradeep Singh Yerur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
