Writ petition by a retired Junior Engineer challenging recovery of amounts from terminal benefits. The court granted a week to comply with office objections and, non-compliance noted in the order sheet, the petition was rejected without reference to the Bench.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR WRIT PETITION No. 102088 OF 2023 (S-RES)
BETWEEN
1 . SHRI. A A SHAIKH (ABDUL RAZAK S/O ANNASAHAB SHAIKH) AGE 70 YEARS OCC JUNIOR ENGINEER (RETIRED) R/O RAMAPUR SITE NEAR OLD GOKAK MILLS SAVADATTI 591126 TQ SAVADATTI DIST BELAGAVI
... PETITIONER
(BY SRI: A S PATIL, ADVOCATE.)
AND
KARNATAKA POWER TRANSMISSION COMPANY LTD (KPTCL)
CAUVERY BHAVAN BENGALURU 560009
DIST DHARWAD
2
. . RESPONDENTS
THIS WP IS FILED PRAYING TO,I. ISSUE WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER ORDER OR DIRECTION, QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 08-12-2016 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 IN NO.KA VI PRA NI NI/B82/23513/2015-16 AS PER ANNEXURE-H CONFIRMING THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 24-04-2015 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 IN NO.KA VI PRA NI NI/B53/24920/2011-12 AS PER ANNEXURE-F.II. ISSUE WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER ORDER OR DIRECTION, DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO REFUND THE AMOUNT OF RS.2,94,056/AND RS.38,690/- RECOVERED FROM THE TERMINAL BENEFITS OF THE PETITIONER PURSUANT TO THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 24-04-2015 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 IN NO.KA VI PRA NI NI/B53/24920/2011-12 AS PER ANNEXURE-F.
This petition coming on for orders this day, the court, made the following;
O R D E R
Peremptory order, granting a week’s time to comply objections, failing which, this petition gets rejected, without reference to the Bench.
SD/JUDGE.
3
Note: As per the endorsement made in the order sheet dated 06.01.2024 the Advocates for the Petitioner has not complied with the office objections.. Hence, this WP No. 102088/2023 stands rejected without reference to the Bench as per the Court Order dated: 25.11.2024.
BY ORDER OF THE COURT
SD/-
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
R- By:-sgs C- By:-sgs T By :-psl
Shri. A A Shaikh (Abdul Razak s/o Annasahab Shaikh)
The Managing Director and the Appellate Authority, Karnataka Power Transmission Company Ltd (KPTCL)
The Director (Admn and HR) and the Disciplinary Authority, KPTCL
The General Manager (Admn and HRD), HESCOM
The Superintendent Engineer (Elcl) O and M Circle, HESCOM
The Executive Engineer (Elcl), HESCOM
Pradeep Singh Yerur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
