Writ petition filed in 2022 was dismissed for non-prosecution: counsel absent when called and office objections remained uncomplied with despite repeated opportunities over two years.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC-D:12331 WP No. 106072 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2024 BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 106072 OF 2022 (KLR-RES)
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
NC: 2024:KHC-D:12331 WP No. 106072 of 2022
R/O: KODANPUR, TQ: KITTUR, DIST: BELAGAVI-591 115.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. ANAND.L.SANDRIMANI AND SRI. S.B.RAWOOT., ADVOCATES [ABSENT])
AND:
…RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
When the matter is called, the petitioners are not represented. When the matter is listed and is called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case.
As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 03.03.2023, on that day, two weeks time was granted to do the needful. Again the petition was listed on 05.07.2024, on that day, two weeks time was granted to comply with the office objections. Despite granting time, office objections were not complied with.
The petition is listed today for orders regarding noncompliance of office objections for the third time. A perusal of the entire order sheet reveals that despite giving sufficient opportunities, the office objections are not complied with. Furthermore, the petition is filed in the year 2022. Now we are in the month of August 2024. The petition is pending for almost two years. As already noted above, when the matter is called, the petitioners are not represented. It appears that the petitioners are not diligent in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution and also for non-compliance of office objections.
Sd/(JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE
MRP LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 29
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shri. Ashok S/o Basappa Udarkeri
Smt. Indravva Vittal Bagalennavar
Smt. Sarojini W/o Manjunath Kalabhanvi
Shri. Raghavendra S/o Gangadhar Udakeri
Smt. Surekha W/o Nagappa Nadavinamani
The State of Karnataka, represented by its Secretary, Revenue Department
Jyoti Mulimani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
