This discharge order (Writ Petition No. 103885 of 2022) dismissed a writ petition regarding cooperative societies for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court objections over approximately two years.
Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution and non-compliance of objections.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 103885 OF 2022 (CS-RES)
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
SECRETARY, R/O: MUDALAGI, TQ: MUDALAGI, DIST: BELAGAVI, PIN CODE NO: 591 312.
…PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SANJAY.S.KATAGERI., ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
AND:
…RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
When the matter is called, the petitioners are not represented. When the matter is listed and is called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case.
As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 29.09.2022, on that day, two weeks time was granted to do the needful. Again the petition was listed on 05.07.2024, on that day, two weeks time was granted to comply with office objections. Despite granting time, office objections were not complied with.
The petition is listed today for orders regarding noncompliance of office objections for the third time. A perusal of the entire order sheet reveals that despite giving sufficient opportunities, the office objections are not complied with. Furthermore, the petition is filed in the year 2022. Now we are in the month of August 2024. The petition is pending for almost two years. As already noted above, when the matter is called, the petitioners are not represented. It appears that the petitioners are not diligent in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution and also for non-compliance of office objections.
Sd/(JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE
MRP LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 25
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow or dismiss a writ petition filed for non-prosecution and non-compliance of court objections.
Mahalaxmi Urban Co-op. Credit Society Limited and others
Principal Secretary, Department of Co-operation, State of Karnataka and others
Jyoti Mulimani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
