This was an oral order dismissing a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution for non-prosecution and non-compliance with office objections despite granted time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC-D:12701 WP No. 105417 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI
WRIT PETITION NO. 105417 OF 2021 (LR)
BETWEEN:
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. MRUTYUNJAYA.S.HALLIKERI., ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
AND:
Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
ALL ARE RESIDING AT: WARD NO.1,
NC: 2024:KHC-D:12701 WP No. 105417 of 2021
GULEDGUDDA, TQ: GULEDGUDDA, DIST: BAGALKOT.
…RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
When the matter is called, the petitioners are not represented. When the matter is listed and is called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case.
As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 28.08.2024, on that day, finally a week’s time was granted to comply with the office objections, failing which, the office was directed to list this matter under the caption ‘for dismissal of petition for non-compliance of office objections’ on 04.09.2024.
The petition is listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Despite granting time, the office objections are not complied. The petitioners have not respected the Court order. As already noted above, when the matter is called, the petitioners are not represented. It appears that the petitioners
NC: 2024:KHC-D:12701 WP No. 105417 of 2021
are not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution and also for non-
compliance of office objections.
Sd/(JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE
MRP LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 35
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mallikarjun @ Mallethappa
Parvati W/o Shivappa
Land Tribunal, Badami
Suresh S/o Yankappa
Renavva W/o Bheemshi
Lakshimbai W/o Yalappa
Jyoti Mulimani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
