Writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India was dismissed for non-prosecution and non-compliance of office objections as petitioners failed to appear or comply with court orders granting time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI
WRIT PETITION NO. 103457 OF 2021 (KLR-RR/SUR)
BETWEEN:
PETITIONERS ARE RESIDENT OF YALEKKI OWNI, HOSARETTI VILLAGE, TQ: & DIST: HAVERI.
…PETITIONERS
Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
(BY SRI. D.M.MALLI., ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
AND:
5A1 TO 5A4 RESIDENTS OF ISHWAR GUDI OWNI, NEAR RAGHAVENDRA MATH HAVERI, TQ: & DIST: HAVERI.
…RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
When the matter is called, the petitioners are not represented. When the matter is listed and is called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case.
As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 27.08.2024, on that day, finally a week’s time was granted to comply with the office objections, failing which, the office was directed to list this matter under the caption ‘for
dismissal of petition for non-compliance of office objections’ on 03.09.2024.
The petition is listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Despite granting time, the office objections are not complied. The petitioners have not respected the Court order. As already noted above, when the matter is called, the petitioners are not represented. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution and also for noncompliance of office objections.
Sd/(JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE
MRP
LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 32
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SMT. RATNAVVA W/O MAHADEVAPPA HALIKERI AND OTHERS
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS
JYOTI MULIMANI
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
