A writ petition was filed by a Recreation Club seeking a writ to prevent police officials from interfering with its lawful activities, contending the club was closed despite prior court orders. The court heard arguments and disposed of the matter by allowing the club to continue activities as per earlier orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024 BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH WRIT PETITION NO. 105228 OF 2024 (GM-POLICE)
BETWEEN:
BHOOMIKA FRIENDS RECREATION CLUB (R), AT. N.H. 66 KALBANDI, BELKE, BHATKAL, TQ: BHATKAL, DIST: UTTARA KANNADA, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, SRI. MADEV S/O. GOVINDA NAIK, AGE: 41 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O. KALBANDI, BELKE, POST: BELKE-581 320, TQ: BHATKAL, DIST: UTTARA KANNADA.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. GANAPATI M. BHAT, ADVOCATE)
AND:
SAROJA HANGARAKI
Location: HIGH COURT OF KARANTAKA DHARWAD BENCH
(BY SRI. PRAVEEN K. UPPAR, AGA)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NOS.4 AND 5 HEREIN NOT TO INTERFERE WITH THE LAWFUL RECREATIONAL ACTIVITIES CARRIED ON BY THE MEMBERS OF THE PETITIONERCLUB/ASSOCIATION, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH)
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.
the petitioner-Club/Association and inspite of it, the respondents are interfering with the day to day activities.
Sd/(H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
PMP CT-MCK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 47
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner Club's contention that the respondents interfered with its lawful recreational activities is sustainable given the State's objection.
Whether the petitioner should be permitted to continue with recreational activities complying with the conditions of the earlier W.P. No. 144834/2020.
BHOOMIKA FRIENDS RECREATION CLUB (R)
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
SAROJA HANGARAKI
THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, UTTARA KANNADA DISTRICT
THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, UTTARA KANNADA DISTRICT
THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, RURAL POLICE STATION, BHATKAL
H.P. SANDESHPATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
