Civil miscellaneous petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of an arbitrator under a partnership deed clause; dismissed as withdrawn on a memo filed by petitioners' counsel. Decides nothing of general application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024 BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CIVIL MISC PETITION NO. 100007 OF 2024 (-)
BETWEEN:
BOTH ARE R/O. DOOR NO.289/A, 290/A, 291/A, WARD NO.4, 2ND BLOCK, OPP. ICE LAND, RANIPET HOSAPETE, VIJAYANAGAR DISTRICT-583201.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. Y. LAKSHMIKANT REDDY, ADVOCATE)
AND:
SAROJA HANGARAKI
Location: HIGH COURT OF KARANTAKA DHARWAD BENCH
…RESPONDENTS
(R1 & R2 SERVED)
THIS CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 11(6) OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT 1996, PRAYING TO NOMINATE SUITABLE ARBITRATOR AS PER CLAUSE 22 OF PARTNERSHIP DEED DATED 30.05.2022 AS PER ANNEXURE-A.
THIS CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS , THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH)
Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo to withdraw the petition.
Memo is taken on record.
In view the memo, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/(H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
PMP
CT-MCK
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3
1 provisions across 1 enactments
K.S. Abhishek
K. Subramanya
T.R. Vadiraj
Saroja Hangaraki
T.S. Gururaj
H.P. Sandesh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
